United Kingdom

Ownership of things attached to Land

Historically, the land has been considered to be the most essential part of property law. The land law of the United Kingdom includes acquisition, content and priority of rights between individuals having an interest in land. There is a difference between having a contractual right and a property right in the land. The latter gives license over other individual’s claims. Traditionally, the property law of the United Kingdom has been heavily dependent on common law and equity. It has derived the most common principles from the common law. However, an essential question has always lingered in property law which is whether the things attached to the property or on the property are part of the property or not. One of the distinct features of English law is the concept of “real property” which essentially means the land as well as the things that go with it. This is different from having a movable or personal property. The reason for this distinction is to explain the nature of the subject matter due to the different tax and registration requirements for land. Nonetheless, the more technical definition of land entails more information than it is defined commonly. Law of Property Act 1925 entails a definition of land which says. “land of any tenure, mines and minerals, whether or not held apart from the surface, buildings or parts of buildings (whether the division is horizontal, vertical or made in any other way) and other hereditaments; also a manor, advowson, and a rent and other incorporeal hereditaments, and an easement, right, privilege or benefit in, over, or derived from land…” [1] This unwieldy definition points out two main conceptions. Firstly, land involves all physical things attached to it whether it be hereditaments or minerals. Secondly, it explains the intangible rights, for instance, an easement. The essay gives detail analysis on the case rulings on the topic which will provide an understanding and a deep analysis of the reasoning behind the ruling.

In Newlon Housing Trust v Alsulaimen[2], Lord Hoffmann opined that in legal studies, property in the land could be defined as a “four-dimensional” right.[3] This includes the two-dimensional area of the land surface which is secured by fence or railing to show a permanent marking. This is important because at times the dispute arises after a contract of selling land has been established but the contract didn’t lay out the specific details. In Holland v Hodgson,[4] Lord Blackburn J opined that looms introduced in a manufacturing plant are part of the land. Items laying on the land, "connected" just by gravity, won't ordinarily be a piece of the land, except if case law and both parties' have an alternate intention in the contract. Effectively removable things, similar to floor coverings and draperies, or houseboats, won't be inferred into a closeout of land as a matter of course. In Chelsea Yacht and Boat Company v Pope,[5] it was opined that a houseboat is not part of the real property or land due to the reason that the nature of annexation is inadequate. In Botham v TSB Bank,[6] the judge made a distinction between a chattel and fixture when it comes to things being part of the land or not. It was opined that the items should be looked holistically, if the purpose of the object is to improve the building and is of permanent nature, it becomes a fixture; however, if it something attached to the land which is of temporary nature and is not essential for the building enhancement then it will be considered as a chattel. This outlines that bath, lavatory and bathroom fittings would belong to the category of fixtures. Moreover, this will also include kitchen sinks and units. However, carpets, curtains, washing machines, dishwashers and kitchen appliances are of temporary nature are categorized as chattels.

The distinction between chattels and fixtures is now cleared. Fixtures are included in the part of property and chattels are not. Now the question arises, whether the things beneath the land surface belong to the owner or they part of the land or not? The third dimension of rights is now to be deliberated. It is considered that mines and things beneath the surface of land belong to the owner of the surface of land; however, it is restricted to 500 feet beneath. Moreover, the owner of the land has the right over the atmosphere above his land.[7] However, the public policy of the state sets limits and restrictions over the use of the property and the belongings of the property. For instance, from the 16^th century, the Crown put forward a stance that every valuable mineral, natural resources, and valuable treasure found on one’s property belong to the crown. Moreover, the law in 20^th century made it punishable for not reporting any treasure found.[8] In R v Earl of Northumberland,[9] a full panel of 12 senior judges opined that, “by the law all mines of gold and silver within the realm, whether they be in the lands of the Queen, or of subjects, belong to the Queen by prerogative, with liberty to dig and carry away the ores thereof, and with other such incidents thereto as are necessary to be used for the getting of the ore.” Moreover, any aircraft or satellite moving above the atmosphere of the owner’s land does not fall under the ambit of trespass if the distance is sufficiently high. Lastly, the fourth dimension right is time. Since 1925 English law perceives two "bequests" in the land, or sorts of possession intrigue: the freehold (expense basic), which is a privilege to use for a boundless time; and the rent (tenure), which is an enthusiasm for a fixed timeframe. In all circumstances, utilization of the land is obliged by understandings and additionally restricting rights with neighbours, and the necessities of the nearby board and government.

            It is always debatable that the objects found on the land are whose property? Often individuals come across instances where they find something on their land which does not belong to them. It might be a lost watch, some money or maybe an item of clothing. However, in some situations, the true owner of such things is not locatable and is unknown. When such a situation arises, other people have a right to claim that property. This would mean a person who finds the object, a tenant (who occupies the land), a landlord and the finder’s employer. One of the most initial cases that establish the possession of the valuable property right and talked about the finder’s right is Armory v Delamirie,[10] This is a famous case that describes the finder’s right. In this case, a chimney sweep’s boy found a jewel. After obtaining the jewel, he went onto know the price of the ring at a goldsmith shop. The agent at the goldsmith secretly removed the gems and refused to return them. The court opined that although both parties have a right in the jewel as it doesn’t belong to either of them. However, the question above the court is to identify who has the better right of possession. The court gave the priority of possession to the finder and gave him the full title of the jewel. In Moffat v Kazana,[11] the court opined that if someone finds something on their land which does not belong to them, the true owner has the proper right to claim the object over anyone else. However, if the true owner is not locatable and is unknown, then the question arise who else found the object and his claim against the object. In a scenario, where a true landowner of the property finds an object whose owner is unidentifiable, the simple concept is that the person who possesses the land would be entitled to the object found on the land. This is even the situation where the landowner was uninformed of the object before it was found and never demonstrated any goal to control the land. Similarly, in Waverley BC v Fletcher,[12] an object which was identified as a gold brooch was discovered beneath the surface of a public park. The court came up with three reasons to differentiate things found on the surface of the land and beneath the land because both are dealt with different treatment. Firstly, an object which is found under the surface of the land belongs to the owner of the land. It would be considered as an integral part of his property. Any individual who finds the object should not remove it from the land without the permission or license of the true owner. If the individual does so, he would fall under the ambit of a “trespasser”. Secondly, when a thing is to be removed from the land which is attached to the land, occasionally this involves intrusion with the land which has the potential to cause damage to the property. Thirdly, an object found beneath the surface of the land is unlikely to be found by its true owner; however, an object on the surface of the land could be lost recently and the owner could return to claim it.

            In South Staffordshire Water Co. v Sharman,[13] the plaintiff hired an individual to clean water of his pool. In the course of cleaning, the defendant found two gold rings and claimed its ownership. The court opined that the plaintiff has the right to claim the ownership of the two rings as he is the true landowner. The court identified that he possesses the right to prohibit any person coming on his land. Moreover, he possesses the right to claim any property found on his land whether under the pool. Moreover, the court found that this case is one where the owner of the land was unaware of the existence of the items. Similarly, in Elwes v Brigg Gas Co.,[14]  a prehistoric boat was discovered by a tenant which was almost six feet beneath the surface of the land. The court opined that the boat belonged to the true owner of the land. It was held that “he was in possession of the ground, not merely of the surface, but everything that lay beneath the surface down to the centre of the earth, and consequently in possession of the boat…”[15]

            When an item is found on top of the land, the finder of the property is generally considered to be the owner of the land. The right could be enforced in the court of law against all except the real true owner of the property. In Parker v British Airways Board, the court opined that if the true owner comes to claim the property, he/she would possess the best claim over the lost property. Firstly, the owner of the land would only be prioritized over the finder of the object if the former had shown an intention to control the land before the discovery of the item on his land. Secondly, the finder of the object could only claim the property if it has been abandoned or lost. Thirdly, the finder would never have a complete absolute claim over the lost object; however, he/she does have the right to claim the property against everyone except the true owner of the property. Fourthly, if a person finds an object in the course of his employment, he/she has to keep it on behalf of the employer, who would possess the right over the object and would exonerate the rights of the true finder. Fifthly, the finder has the obligation to find the true owner of the object. Sixthly, the tenant or the occupier has more right over the finder of any item attached to the land or found on the land. Lastly, as stated above the tenant would have more right over the lost property found on his land as compared to the finder of that property; however, the tenant should have the prior intention of controlling the land before the object was found.

Bibliography

Case laws

Armory v Delamirie [1722] EWHC J94

Botham v TSB Bank [1997] 73 P & CR D 1

Chelsea Yacht and Boat Company v Pope [2001] 2 All ER 409

Elwes v Brigg Gas Co. [1886] 33 Ch D 562

Holland v Hodgson [1872] LR 7 CP 328

Newlon Housing Trust v Alsulaimen [1999] 1 AC 313

Moffat v Kazana [1969] 2 W.L.R. 71

R v Earl of Northumberland [1568] 1 Plowden 310 75 ER 472

South Staffordshire Water Co. v Sharman [1869] 2 Q.B. 44

Waverley BC v Fletcher [1995] 4 All ER 756

Legislation

Law of Property Act 1925

Rules of the Air Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/734)

Treasure Act 1996

---

[1] Law of Property Act 1925, s 205(1)(ix)

[2] [1999] 1 AC 313

[3] ibid

[4] [1872] LR 7 CP 328

[5] [2001] 2 All ER 409

[6] [1997] 73 P & CR D 1

[7] Rules of the Air Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/734)

[8] Treasure Act 1996, s 8(3)

[9] [1568] 1 Plowden 310 75 ER 472.

[10]  [1722] EWHC J94

[11] [1969] 2 W.L.R. 71

[12] [1995] 4 All ER 756

[13] [1869] 2 Q.B. 44

[14] [1886] 33 Ch D 562

[15] ibid

Role of international media in the political, social and economic condition of less develop countries.

1.      Introduction

The impact of international media plays a major role to define the socio-political dynamics of less developed countries or the third world countries. The way international media portrays the image of a pertinent issue, it is perceived by the overall world in a similar fashion. The international media environment is ever changing and its not static and it continues to be unanticipated which sometimes have serious consequences in the countries. It can be debated that the current international media has shaped our conscience about certain pertinent issues. In the contemporary time period, international media has the capacity to change public opinion by incorporating certain ideas that were previously unknown. The local media is more or less are controlled by the powerful people which most likely include the government itself. Similarly, the international media is controlled by the first world countries who want to portray a certain set of ideas in the eyes of the public (Al Jenaibi, 2010). The piece of paper looks into the role of international media in the political, social and economic conditions of less developed countries. The focus would be kept on the Arab springs. Firstly, the paper would give out the basic functions of the media to set out how it affects the intergovernmental issues. Secondly, it provides the role of international media in shaping political and economic conditions of the less developed countries. Lastly, it would focus on the Arab Springs and the way the international media has portrayed.

2.      Political functions of media

It is impossible to grasp the media’s political function and their impact on nations and the politics of states. “This part explains five political functions of the media. This encompasses information provision, agenda setting, a public watchdog, political mobilization and regime legitimating” (Richardson, 2007). Firstly, the role of media in manifesting, producing, and propagating information around the globe. These functions make them instruments that embodies certain meanings. The powerful politicians try to propagate a certain set of agenda. They would try to maximize their potential of winning by promoting a set of ideas that favour their situation (Richardson, 2007). Hence, the role of media discourse is pertinent in propagating the information because it then reflects how people perceive information (Al-Jenaibi  B, 2010). The media choose the set of information it wants to spread and emphasize on a set of particular details. It is impossible for them to make us think what we do not want to but they influence to change our thinking by their purpose of “agenda building”. Moreover, the politicians use the media as a key to promoting their messages and their political agenda. The increase in the spreading of information through the platform of media has caused the government to have less control over the information related to politics. The new era of media has caused a wide distribution of information. The information is now more decentralized and is not accumulated in the hands of a few. This shows that the media is not always a tool used by the government but it also has the ability to act against the government to gain more control to change the opinion of the masses. This function is more like a public watchdog. It can provide an accountability criterion for the public and empower the citizens and voters in a democratic country. Moreover, the media is also used for political mobilization by the political parties (Brown, 2009). This generally happens in elections and the purpose is to pressurize the other parties or to show the power that they have over masses. Similarly, the last function is the regime legitimization. The media is often used to legitimize a regime. It develops a sense of acceptance regarding the new regime and institutionalizes the norms that help in regime legitimization.

3.      The role of international media in shaping political and economic of less developed countries

The local and worldwide popular conclusion has turned out to be the prominent factors in the detailing of remote strategy in the time of intervention. Prior to this period, global legislative issues were done for the most part away from public scrutiny in mystery and incognito manoeuvrings. All through the 20^th century, the governments used media as a tool to impact general conclusion on outside strategies of states to support them (Cohen, 1986). It was found that at the dimension of approach execution, government divisions, person authorities and clergymen utilize broad communications as immediate diverts to outside social orders in the motivation behind disclosing the arrangement to abroad publics to progress or disguise approach assessments. It was noticed that lawmakers utilize broad communications in worldwide exchanges so as to control a worldwide open circle and other governments. It very well may be depicted as a roundabout media effect that chiefly relies upon weight from the administration's factions and intrigue bunches that can result to strategy change at the arranging phase of a choice in remote arrangement. “In particular, amid the Cold War the US had utilized the media in getting its ideological message out there in the worldwide” (Hammond, 2007). With one another its hard control and efficient methods, the media had added to the strengthening of US authority (De Jong, 2005). The media streams from the United States to alternate nations attempted to spread its enemy of socialist promulgation and to give consolation to its collusions that the transoceanic point of view was legitimate in contradiction of the Soviet risk. Strategic propaganda about contradicting powers weakened the Soviet endeavours and controlled worldwide general sentiment.

4.      The role of Al-Jazeera in International media

In the contemporary time period, the statesmen know about execution in worldwide legislative issues can change the picture of a state according to worldwide gatherings of people. The achievement in outside approach can influence the prevalence of the pioneers and their re-appointment chance in residential legislative issues. On this writing structure, this investigation features that other than the military and monetary power, the media are essential to pick up power and impact over different states in worldwide relations. All the more vitally, by concentrating on the idea of "Al Jazeera impact", this segment contends that the US worldwide authority has been tested in the power battle on data (Seib 2012). As a matter of first importance, the idea of the “Al Jazeera” impact in reference to its effects on the Arab world. Specifically, the pattern of enabling the quieted or on the other hand minimized countries and gatherings are called “Al Jazeera” impact. In this manner, this idea has been utilized to demonstrate the impacts of new transnational systems and web put together news media with respect to global relations. By offering a counterhegemonic asset and power, it professed to give another viewpoint to the world came to past the focal point of the West. In 2003, “Al Jazeera” ended up open through its site for English speakers so as to contact more prominent crowd and more noteworthy impact. “Al Jazeera” has assumed a noteworthy job giving a stage to talking about the issues of Arab social orders and has trigged the requests of the majority rule change which implies it has a capacity to affect strategy and general sentiment (Kuhn, 2007). In addition, it has tested American points of view and activities around the globe with broad nearby news organizes as it was seen amid the Iraq War (King, 2009). The non-Western writers and systems conveyed the Iraqi viewpoint to the discourse; therefore, the world just could perceive what was going there from various perspectives. Broadcasting the occasions universally broke the restraining infrastructure of Western media on revealing and characterizing the war. “In 2012 Al Jazeera America started to communicate to American groups of onlookers in New York to anchor access to link and satellite circulation in the US” (Mermin, 1999).

5.      Arab Spring and role of international media

The Arab Spring of 2010-2011 which otherwise called as the expansion in the Middle East and North Africa is the progressive flood of exhibitions and dissents that occurred from 18^th December 2010 in the “Middle East” and “North Africa”. Earlier this period, Sudan was the main Arab nation that effectively toppled domineering routines in 1964 and 1985. Amid the Arab Spring uprisings happened in Tunisia and Egypt, a common war started in Libya, while uprisings were seen in Bahrain, Syria and Yemen. Expansive shows occurred in Algeria, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Morocco and Oman. Littler dissents were sorted out in Djibouti, Kuwait, Lebanon, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia and Sudan. The basic element of all exhibits was opposition through battles, strikes and walks and battle by means of the use of interpersonal organizations, for example, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube pointed towards the association, correspondence and data of worldwide masses in regard the above nation's endeavours to stop persecution and oversight. A definitive motivation behind all demonstrators in the Arab world has been the general population's craving for the routine's fall. The occasions happening amid the verifiable Arab Spring moved worldwide concentration towards nearby broadcasting companies and unquestionably expanded their notoriety on a world premise; one of these systems was positively “Al Jazeera”. “Al Jazeera's inclusion of the Arabic Spring was made both in English and Arabic and was made on a 24-hour premise by means of its satellite TV, its site, and Twitter” (Agrawal R, 2012). As the uprisings in a few Arab nations rose, worldwide media introduced and exhibited the occasions under the single heading of the 'Bedouin Spring’. Hence, dissimilar occasions that started in limitlessly varying recorded conditions inside isolated Arab nations were relegated a typical name, subject, and aesthetics: the 'Bedouin Spring'. The term is from one perspective homogenizing the Arab world to a typical area, concealing the distinctive narratives, dialects and cultures. On the other hand, it is related with arousing – spring, the season of sowing what will be gathered in fall. Also, the season represents trust after along and profound winter. Furthermore, this appears to have been an offering point for media as well as to the demonstrators. The segment with commitments on the inclusion of the 'Middle Easterner Spring' in Europe and South America features strains between alternate points of view on developments in the district that are educated by national, ideological or corporative interests. In his article "The Arab Spring is a Latin American Winter" Massimo Di Ricco from Bogota presents the improvement of a collaboration between the two transnational satellite TV stations, the dish Latin American station TeleSUR and the Qatar-based “Al-Jazeera”, which after they had consented to the arrangement of cooperation 2006 were denounced by US moderate Republicans to develop a "system of fear". Di Ricco contends that the inclusion of the uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Syria until summer 2011 by TeleSUR is by all accounts rather a consequence of political interests of the station's authors than an endeavour seeking after adjusted data. While on account of Egypt and Tunisia TeleSUR was communicating the voice of the general population, on account of Syria and Libya the voice heard was that of agreeable governments (Hokayem, 2013). Now the channel, for the most part, centred around denouncing international media control. In these assaults to global media, an immediate and circuitous target was Al-Jazeera, up to that point an accomplice and good example for TeleSUR. In the repercussions of the 'Middle Easterner Spring', the collusion between the two Arab and Latin American systems seems to lose its hold. With a point by point near investigation of Danish press inclusion of the uprisings in Tunisia and Syria from January-March 2011 Mikkel Fugl Eskjær shows that the 'Bedouin Spring' has created extraordinary thoughtfulness regarding the Arab world in European news media. His blended quantitative and subjective substance analysis monitors likewise examples of and changes in news providing details regarding the Middle East, “which show that the 'Middle Easterner Spring' tested past examples of media consideration regarding the Middle East including social conditions, new media, relations between religion and democracy separated from the more conventional topics of savagery”.

Logical inconsistencies in regard to the validity of the specific system prompted “a progression of occasions, for example, the accepted as constrained abdication of its previous boss, Wadah Khanfar, his substitution by Sheik Ahmed, a managerial at Qatargas and an individual from the decision group of Qatar, the acquiescence of “Al Jazeera's” correspondent, Ali Hashem, who blamed the system for predisposition, and a general ascent and fall of the system's appraisals; evaluations were incredibly high and Al Jazeera was amazingly well known amid the occasions in Egypt and Tunisia, while dropped as watchers wound up mindful of the system's quiet in Bahrain's communicating, the introduction of unconfirmed recordings of occasions in Syria, and the agreeable revealing of the Oman and Saudi Arabia exhibit.” Beneath the inclusion of various nations' cooperation on the Arab Spring is displayed as a method for fathoming the ways “Al Jazeera” really introduced the entire arrangement of occasions. Wadah Khanfar additionally included the accompanying: "Al Jazeera following the upheaval began was restricted, the workplace was shut and reporters were not permitted to move by any stretch of the imagination. Furthermore, even the satellite flag of Al Jazeera covering Egypt was dropped from NileSat, which is the significant Arab satellite dispersion" (Miller, 2007).

The Al Jazeera remained for the most part quiet regarding the Bahraini unrest broadcasting. The inadequacy of the detailing of the Bahrain occasions turned out to be much increasingly obvious on the Arabic Channel of Al Jazeera's system, since its inclusion would unquestionably have a more noteworthy political effect to the Arabic locale populace than to the rest Arab total populace seeing the separate English Channel; as previous Al Jazeera's English benefactor Dave Marash expressed: "Al Jazeera Arabic has genuinely harmed its image in the Middle East by taking a jump on Bahrain, and fundamentally following the manages of the Saudi government and broadcasting just from the Bahrain imperial family perspective. Then again, in regard to the Yemen upheaval, the workplaces of Al Jazeera in Sanaa were shut down in light of the fact that the channel was blamed for spreading false news about the circumstance in Yemen" (Miller, 2007). Regardless, Al Jazeera delegates negated above allegations by announcing its journalists' challenging and inside troublesome conditions broadcasting of the Yemeni occasions and further guaranteeing its watchers that the circumstance in the specific nation will keep being checked notwithstanding its neighbourhood workplaces closed down (Hollis, 2012). The validity of Al Jazeera was indeed addressed by the Arabic populace in regard to the system's inclusion of the Arab Spring extended in Syria, Eastern Saudi Arabia and Oman; however the telecom of occasions happening in every one of the three locales was broad, it was blamed for being relentless, and as the mean of giving voice to the upheavals restricting gatherings by means of the introduction and replaying of a progression of unconfirmed recordings of kidnappings, murders and military staff renunciations; a few of these system news' disclosures were later ended up being manufactured. Amid these pivotal occasions and allegations, the systems at the time being boss “(Wadah Khanfar)” was constrained to leave, while Sheik Ahmed took power driving by numerous the system's freedom to the emotional introduction of occasions, dependably in agreement to Qatari routine.

The political character of Al Jazeera is said to having moved toward becoming proof by and by amid the November 2011 started upheaval in Syria; as indicated by reports in regard to occasions of the time, when the renegades exhibited their proposals to the Syrian government, its priest of outside undertakings asserted that harmful inclusion end by specific media (in a roundabout way alluding to Al Jazeera) ought to be incorporated as a precondition to the agitators' recommendations. Amid this time, the as of now referenced abdication of Al Jazeera's correspondent, Ali Hashem, occurred with the method of reasoning of the predisposition inclusion of Bahrain's and Syria's communicating, and after the production of hacked “Al Jazeera's” messages by the Syrian Electronic Army, where Ali Hashem's worries of the manner in which the system depicted the Syrian upheaval wound up known to the world.

6.      Conclusion

In a nutshell, the media has been utilized as a compelling device to control individuals' sentiments and points of view towards specific issues which are grounded by the legislatures. It is eminent, nonetheless, that albeit a few scientists guarantee that the media can strongly affect political feelings and results there are different analysts who recommend that such impacts are restricted. Regardless, the examination would contend that the media is clearly utilized as a device to coordinate individuals towards specific frames of mind and assessments which correspond with the administration's desires and desires. This suggests media can be politicized with the corresponding impact that a few analysts guarantee that the media affects brutality. there is proof that the media is a persuasive instrument that can even 'coordinate' individuals to act in certain ways. Then again, additional proof keeps up that the media and internet-based life's impact isn't so incredible and can be overwhelmed by the activities of people or gatherings of people who hold solid perspectives which may lead them to challenge the nearby specialists or even topple them, as occurred in the Arab Spring. With everything taken into account, it is apparent that the exploration is as yet endeavouring to address the changing conditions brought about by the presentation of new news sources and elective channels of correspondence, for example, the internet, social media life stages and portable 'telephone utilization, all of which makes it hard to achieve complete ends.

Faceook Revolving Images | Real,Working and Tested.

This is a really cool trick by using simple Javascipt,Its really cool and its working.I have tested it.There was a fake Virus Spreading a Website that just scams you and automatically sends it to all your friends.But this script which i found is really working.

So this is what you have to do :

javascript:R=0; x1=.1; y1=.05; x2=.25; y2=.24; x3=1.6; y3=.24; x4=300; y4=200; x5=300; y5=200; DI=document.getElementsByTagName("img"); DIL=DI.length; function A(){for(i=0; i-DIL; i++){DIS=DI[ i ].style; DIS.position='absolute'; DIS.left=(Math.sin(R*x1+i*x2+x3)*x4+x5)+"px"; DIS.top=(Math.cos(R*y1+i*y2+y3)*y4+y5)+"px"}R++}setInterval('A()',5); void(0);

Paste the above script in the URL box as shown.And then you'll see the images revolving as you move your mouse cursor.Here is what you have to do :

Cool huh ?? Its really amazing.If you have any questions then please do post them below.

Windows key Stealer v1.0 Xp/vista/7

Hi guys,

Its been quite a while since i released another tool of mine.So here I am with a simple but a very useful tool. I have come across in the Marketing section that most of them were selling Windows keys.That's the basis of this Tool !

What it does ?

It Steals Windows XP / Windows Vista / Windows 7 Product key
It adds itself to Startup
It closes itself as soon as the Stealing process is done. (So no suspicion)
Its make my site (" http://searchr.us ") default homepage and search engine for Firefox and Internet Explorer Only.
It copies itself to System32 Folder so that its hidden always.

Note: DO NOT Test on your Computer.Run it Sand boxed or an a Virtual Machine.

Facebook magic codes

You may have seen many Facebook status and posts which says you to re post the given post by removing some symbols in the code. When you do so the code changes into text magically.


Below I Listed Some of the Codes.. Have fun..



1) Copy any one of the codes.

2) Paste them in your Facebook status or comments.

3) Then remove the "+" sign then press Enter.

 Here Are The Codes.


@+[290169721005985:0] - I Love You
@+[263812423664428:0] - I am always with you
@+[172417706184835:0] - Ye Dosti hum nahi todenge
@+[291116797575161:0] - FriendS r EvErYtHiNg
@+[125710659238:0] - FRIENDS FOREVER
{@+[130183157042112:0]} - {EVER Green Friendship}
@+[145480518867077:0] - I Still Love
@+[117111614980889:page] - VERY FUNNY
@+[134282353283788:0] - Life is too short smile while you still have teeth
@+[276318582393095:0] - Chess mania

Remove seen feature from facebook chat

Facebook recently launched a new feature of SEEN in chat. But most of you are not liking this feature just because of some privacy and internal matters. So here is the tool through which you can disable it.


This is a simple extension to revert Facebook chat to the old style where it only shows online friends and hides the mini news-feed. Unlike a lot of other fixes, this extension does not require that you like a page or install a facebook application.

Facebook antivirus

Hello Readers, When our PC is protected with Antivirus then we feel full freedom like we click any links and install any softwares, so I thought to search something which helps us to protect our facebook profile with some spammy links and applications and lastly I found superb applications which is really worked like a Antivirus program.


Its an important task to check whether links of our facebook profile contain any virus or not. This application will help you to scan your own profile and walls for viruses. By scanning with this application, you will easily get notified about the presence of virus and you can remove the infected links.


This is a kind of Antivirus program which works as a Facebook App. This application is released by NORTON ( Symantec ). After allowing the application, you will get an option as " Auto Scan ". Just click it and ensure your safety on Facebook. Click on the below link and Allow it in your account.

Click For Allow Application

Finally Installed ?? So from now onwards you will find red mark near the infected links and green mark near the trusted ones.